Overview
High Entropy Alloys
High Entropy Alloys (HEAs) are a class of metallic materials composed of five or more principal elements in near-equimolar ratios (typically 5–35 at% each). Unlike conventional alloys that center on one or two base metals, HEAs exploit the configurational entropy of mixing to stabilize single-phase disordered solid solutions over intermetallic compounds, often yielding exceptional combinations of mechanical strength, hardness, and corrosion resistance.
Predicting whether a given multi-component composition will form a solid solution (rather than segregate into intermetallic phases) is a central challenge in HEA design. HEACalculator implements a suite of published phenomenological criteria that use thermodynamic and structural parameters as proxies for phase stability.
Calculated Parameters
Mixing Enthalpy
where \(x_i\) is the mole fraction of element \(i\) and \(\Delta H_{AB}^{\text{mix}}\) is the binary mixing enthalpy from Miedema's model.1
Miedema Mixing Enthalpy
where the three contributions for each ordered pair \((i \to j)\) are:
- Chemical interface term \(H_{\text{chem}}\): from the Miedema macroscopic atom model (de Boer et al. 1988)14
- Elastic mismatch term \(H_{\text{el}}\): from Eshelby theory applied to atomic size and bulk/shear modulus mismatches
- Structural term \(H_{\text{struct}}\): from Niessen and Miedema (1983)15 via tabulated valence-dependent energies
This three-term formula follows King et al. Supplementary Eq. S8.11 It is used for the Model 8 solid-solution criterion.
Mixing Entropy
where \(R = 8.314\,\text{J/(mol·K)}\) is the gas constant.
Formation Enthalpy
Binary formation enthalpies \(\Delta H_{ij}^f\) are taken from DFT calculations by Troparevsky et al.2
Atomic Size Difference (δ)
where \(r_i\) is the atomic radius of element \(i\) and \(\bar{r} = \sum_i x_i r_i\) is the average radius.4
Allen Electronegativity Difference (\(\Delta\chi_{\text{Allen}}\))
where \(\chi_i\) is the Allen configuration energy (CE) of element \(i\) in Pauling units and \(\bar{\chi} = \sum_i x_i \chi_i\) is the composition-weighted average.1213
Pauling Electronegativity Difference (\(\Delta\chi_{\text{Pauling}}\))
where \(\chi_i\) is the Pauling electronegativity of element \(i\) and \(\bar{\chi} = \sum_i x_i \chi_i\) is the composition-weighted average.16
Omega (Ω)
where \(T_m = \sum_i x_i T_{m,i}\) is the composition-weighted melting temperature.5
Gamma (γ)
where \(r_S\) and \(r_L\) are the radii of the smallest and largest atoms, respectively.6
Lambda (λ)
A combined entropy–misfit parameter.7
Valence Electron Concentration (VEC)
Used to predict the stable crystal structure (FCC, BCC, or HCP).3
Hume-Rothery Electron-to-Atom Ratio (e/a)
where \((e/a)_i\) is the number of outer s+p electrons of element \(i\); d and f electrons are not counted. This follows the Hume-Rothery convention and is distinct from VEC.17
Density
where \(M_i\) and \(V_i\) are the molar mass and atomic volume of element \(i\).
Melting Temperature
Solid-Solution Prediction Models
HEACalculator implements eight published criteria. Each model returns "Solid Solution", "Intermetallic", or "Multiple Phases".
| Model | Author(s) | Criteria | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yang & Zhang (2012) | \(\Omega \geq 1.1\) and \(\delta \leq 6.6\%\) | 5 |
| 2 | Guo et al. (2013) | \(-11.6 < \Delta H_{\text{mix}} < 3.2\,\text{kJ/mol}\) and \(\delta < 6.6\%\) | 8 |
| 3 | Wang et al. (2015) | \(\gamma < 1.175\) | 6 |
| 4 | Singh et al. (2014) | \(\lambda > 0.96\) (SS); \(0.24 \leq \lambda \leq 0.96\) (SS + compound); \(\lambda < 0.24\) (compound) | 7 |
| 5 | Ye et al. (2015) | \(\phi = (S_C - S_H) / \lvert S_E\rvert \geq 20\) | 9 |
| 6 | Troparevsky et al. (2015) | \(\Delta H_f^{\min} > -T_{\text{crit}}\Delta S_{\text{mix}}\) and \(\Delta H_f^{\max} < 37\,\text{meV/atom}\), \(T_{\text{crit}} = 0.55\,T_m\) | 2 |
| 7 | Senkov & Miracle (2016) | \(\Omega(T_{\text{anneal}}) \geq k_2 \cdot \Delta S_{\text{mix}} / R\) | 10 |
| 8 | King et al. (2016) | \(\phi = \Delta G_{\text{SS}} / (-\lvert \Delta G_{\max}\rvert) \geq 1\) | 11 |
A microstructure prediction based on VEC is also provided:
- VEC ≥ 8: FCC
- VEC < 6.87: BCC
- 6.87 ≤ VEC < 8: BCC + FCC (mixed)
- 2.5 ≤ VEC < 3.5: HCP
References
-
Zhang, Y.; Zuo, T.T.; Tang, Z.; Gao, M.C.; Dahmen, K.A.; Liaw, P.K.; Lu, Z.P. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2014, 61, 1–93. ↩
-
Troparevsky, M. C.; Morris, J. R.; Kent, P. R. C.; Lupini, A. R.; Stocks, G. M. Phys. Rev. X 2015, 5(1), 011041. ↩
-
Guo, S.; Ng, C.; Lu, J.; Liu, C.T. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 109, 103505. ↩
-
Fang, S.S.; Xiao, X.S.; Xia, L.; Li, W.H.; Dong, Y.D. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2003, 321, 120–125. ↩
-
Yang, X.; Zhang, Y. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 132, 233–238. ↩
-
Wang, Z.; Huang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, C.T. Scr. Mater. 2015, 94, 28–31. ↩
-
Singh, A.K.; Kumar, N.; Dwivedi, A.; Subramaniam, A. Intermetallics 2014, 53, 112–119. ↩
-
Guo, S.; Hu, Q.; Ng, C.; Liu, C.T. Intermetallics 2013, 41, 96–103. ↩
-
Ye, Y.F.; Wang, Q.; Lu, J.; Liu, C.T.; Yang, Y. Scr. Mater. 2015, 104, 53–55. ↩
-
Senkov, O.N.; Miracle, D.B. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 658, 603–607. ↩
-
King, D.J.M.; Middleburgh, S.C.; McGregor, A.G.; Cortie, M.B. Acta Mater. 2016, 104, 172–179. ↩
-
Mann, J.B.; Meek, T.L.; Allen, L.C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2780–2783. ↩
-
Mann, J.B.; Meek, T.L.; Knight, E.T.; Capitani, J.F.; Allen, L.C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5132–5137. ↩
-
de Boer, F.R.; Boom, R.; Mattens, W.C.M.; Miedema, A.R.; Niessen, A.K. Cohesion in Metals: Transition Metal Alloys. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988. ↩
-
Niessen, A.K.; Miedema, A.R. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 717–723. ↩
-
Haynes, W.M. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 95th ed.; CRC Press: London, 2014. ISBN 9781482208689. ↩
-
Hume-Rothery, W.; Smallman, R.E.; Haworth, C.W. The Structure of Metals and Alloys, 5th ed.; Institute of Metals: London, 1969. ↩